Results

411. Fully-matching results

412. Executive Summary P E R F O R M ... PDF (1382k)

     15 Mar 2021: o Finding the courthouse was easy (91% agreed/strongly agreed) o I was treated with courtesy and respect (89%) o I felt safe in the courthouse (89%) o It was easy

     https://www.mncourts.gov/getattachment/About-The-Courts/PublicationsAndReports/Container-Performance-Measures/Content-Performance-Measures/Annual-Report-2020-Perf-Measures-(1).pdf.aspx?lang=en-US

413. Attorneys at Law A Professional LImIted Liabibty Partnership January… PDF (7449k)

     17 Oct 2003: Attorneys at Law A Professional LImIted Liabibty Partnership. January 26,200l. Hand Delivered Frederick Grittner Clerk of Appellate Courts 305 Minnesota Judicial Center 25 Constitution Avenue St. Paul, MN 55155. OFFICE OF AW’ELLATE COURTS. JAN 2 6

     https://www.mncourts.gov/mncourtsgov/media/AdministrativeFileArchive/Harley-Davidson%20Litigation%20C1-01-118/2001-01-26-Harley-Davidson-Response.pdf

414. 1 I STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT C9-85-1506 ... PDF (5972k)

     17 Oct 2003: 1 I. STATE OF MINNESOTA. IN SUPREME COURT. C9-85-1506. In re Public Hearing on. Vacancies in Judicial. Positions in the ORDER yb. Fifth Judicial District. WHEREAS, the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 2.722,. Subd. la (1985), prescribe

     https://www.mncourts.gov/mncourtsgov/media/AdministrativeFileArchive/Judicial%20Vacancies%205th%20Dist%20ADM10-8017%20(formerly%20C9-85-1506)/1985-09-13-Order-Re-9-13-85-Hearing-and-Responses.pdf

415. 4’ * i \ q STATE OF MINNESOTA IN ... PDF (5467k)

     5 Feb 2004: 4’ i q. STATE OF MINNESOTA. IN SUPREME COURT. ORDER PRESCRIBING AND PROMUIGATING NEW RULES OF CIVIL APPELLATE PROCEDURE INTHE SUPREMECOURT. WHEREAS, an Advisory Committee appointed by the. Supreme Court has recommended to the court the adoption of.

     https://www.mncourts.gov/mncourtsgov/media/AdministrativeFileArchive/Civil%20Appellate%20Procedure%20ADM09-8006%20(formerly%20C4-84-2133)/1967-12-07-Order-Adopting-Rls-of-Civ-App-Procedure.pdf

416. STATE OF M W S O T A IN ... PDF (3870k)

     20 Nov 2008: STATE OF M W S O T A. IN SUPREME COURT. C1-84-2137. ORDER FOR HEARING TO CONSIDER PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE RELATING TO IMPLEMENTATION OF ITV PROTOCOL. In October 1999, the Court approved a pilot project for the limited

     https://www.mncourts.gov/mncourtsgov/media/AdministrativeFileArchive/Criminal%20Procedure%20Rules%20ADM10-8049%20formerly%20C1-84-2137/2007-03-08-Order-5-15-07-Hearing-ITV-Protocol-and-Responses.pdf

417. STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT C&@I- 16 50 ... PDF (425k)

     13 Oct 2003: STATE OF MINNESOTA. IN SUPREME COURT. C&@I- 16 50. ORDER FOR HEARING TO CONSIDER PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE MINNESOTA RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT. OFFICE OF APPELLATECOURTS. MAR 1 4 2002. FILED. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Supreme Court will

     https://www.mncourts.gov/mncourtsgov/media/AdministrativeFileArchive/Code%20of%20Prof%20Conduct%20C8-84-1650/2002-03-14-Order-Prof-Conduct-6-18-02-Hearing.pdf

418. 130615609_3 PDF (4094k)

     25 Sep 2018: Exhibit A. 10-PR-16-46 Filed in District CourtState of Minnesota9/24/2018 3:52 PM. 4/27/2016 12:11 PM Scanned By Carver County Court Administration. STATE OF MINNESOTA. COUNTY OF CARVER. DISTRICT COURTPROBATE DIVISIONFIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT. Estate

     https://www.mncourts.gov/mncourtsgov/media/High-Profile-Cases/10-PR-16-46/McMillan-Declaration-Exhibits-A,-D,-E,-H,-I,-L-M,-O,-Q,-R,-S,-and-T.pdf

419. STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT C6-84-2 165 ORDER ... PDF (2174k)

     20 Oct 2003: However, the Committee felt that there were overriding policy reasons for requiring juvenile cases to move through the court system on an expedited basis, and voted to retain the amendment as ... The Committee as a whole felt that it was inappropriate to

     https://www.mncourts.gov/mncourtsgov/media/AdministrativeFileArchive/Juvenile%20Procedure%20Rls%20C6-84-2165/2003-02-18-Order-4-29-03-Hearing-Responses.pdf

420. STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT C4-97- 1693 ORDER ... PDF (7505k)

     20 Oct 2003: The committee felt that a non-custodial parent’s interests would be sufftciently protected by:.

     https://www.mncourts.gov/mncourtsgov/media/AdministrativeFileArchive/Juvenile%20Protection%20Rules%20C4-97-1693/1999-06-10-Order-8-25-99-Hearing-Responses.pdf

421. STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT 81-876 OFFICE OF ... PDF (8697k)

     14 Oct 2003: STATE OF MINNESOTA. IN SUPREME COURT. 81-876. OFFICE OF APPELLATE COURTS. MAf 2 5 1993. In Re: Supreme Court Special Court Reporter Certification Fact Finding Committee. Findings of the Minnesota Supreme Court Special Court Reporter Certification

     https://www.mncourts.gov/mncourtsgov/media/AdministrativeFileArchive/Court%20Reporter%20Qualifications%2081-876/1993-03-19-Final-Report-of-Fact-Finding-Cmte.pdf