Public Notice Detail
Laws Impacting Judiciary to Take Effect
Posted: Tuesday, June 29, 1999
“Out of our initial request for eighteen judges, a total of thirteen, phased in over two years, were funded,” said Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice Kathleen A. Blatz. “We are pleased that the other two branches of government have recognized the connection between adequate resources and effective justice. This is a very good start.”
NEW JUDGES:
The judgeships will be staggered in four waves:
July 1, 1999 7th 9th 10th
January 1, 2000 1st 2nd 10th
July 1, 2000 7th 9th 10th
January 1, 2001 1st 4th 2nd 10th
The Supreme Court, in consultation with the district’s bench and Chief Judge, will make decisions about where judges will be chambered. Governor Ventura will then appoint the judges to the various seats. The Legislature appropriated $4.7 million over the next biennium to fund the new judgeships.
JUDICIAL PAY:
Completing the last phase of a 1997 pay bill, the Legislature appropriated a __% increase in district court judge’s salaries effective July 1, 1999 and another __% increase for January 1, 2000. Minnesota currently ranks in the bottom half of states (31st) for judicial salaries.
STATE FUNDING:
Also beginning July 1, court administration costs in the 5th, 7th and 9th judicial districts will begin a shift from county to state funding. Court employees in those judicial districts who are now county employees would become state employees. An ongoing state-funding pilot project in the 8th judicial district will also be made permanent and a timetable for state cost assumption in every district will be developed. The funding shift is made possible through a transfer of county “HACA” property tax revenues and filing fee revenues to the state.
CHILD SUPPORT:
Based on a January 1999 Supreme Court ruling, all child support hearings must now be handled in the judicial branch, and not through the Office of Administrative Hearings, where it has been for many years. Interim rules governing the new, expedited hearings process take effect July 1, along with an additional $2.3 million for implementation.
Chief Justice Blatz also set the stage for next year’s legislative agenda, citing concerns about the justice system’s technological abilities. Although individual district’s computer systems are improving, information in many areas still does not readily transfer from one district to another.
“The judiciary is both a major supplier and consumer of case information,” Chief Justice Blatz said. “We simply must do a better job of tracking and integrating data. Minnesota’s crime victims, our employers and our public safety depend on it.”
Currently, the judiciary receives less than one percent of the state’s total budget.