Precedential Opinions
Under
Minn. Rule of Civil Appellate Procedure 136.01, the Court of Appeals issues a precedential opinion (formerly called "published opinions") only to clarify or develop the law. In deciding whether to issue a precedential opinion, the court considers multiple factors listed in Minn. R. Civ. App. P. 136.01, subd. (1)(b), including whether the case establishes a new principle or rule of law, clarifies existing case law, decides a novel issue involving a constitutional provision, statute, administrative rule or rule of court, or resolves a significant or recurring legal issue. Precedential opinions will be considered and used by courts faced with similar issues in the future, and they are published in books of caselaw found in most law libraries. Under
Minn. R. Civ. App. P. 128.02, subd. 1(f), parties may advise the court whether a precedential opinion would be helpful.
DECISIONS OF THE COURT OF APPEALS
FILED MONDAY, JUNE 22, 2026
A25-1808 Texa Tonka Shopping Center, LLC, Respondent, vs. JK 4 AL LLC LLC,
Respondent, Katherine Prantner, Respondent, and John O Donnell, Respondent,
Donn J. Vetter, et al., Appellants.
Hennepin County District Court, Hon. Bruce D. Manning.
Under Minnesota Rule of Civil Procedure 24, a district court may reject intervention in an
action even though no party timely objected to a notice of intervention.
Affirmed. Judge Tracy M. Smith.